Italian Recipes pizza crock pot fudge recipes

Anatoly T. Fomenko

History: Fiction or Science?

This book shall change your entire perception of history. Its author, an eminent mathematician, follows in steps of Sir Isaac Newton and proves with astronomical data and statistical analysis of ancient documents that the history of humankind is drastically shorter than consensual chronology suggests.

Jesus Christ was born in 1053 and crucified in 1086 AD

The author demonstrates encyclopaedic education, great eloquence, and a truly good knowledge and understanding of the numerous sources. The book definitely contains an abundance of chunky facts for a prying mind.

Apocalypse was written after 1486 AD

Not quite what you have learned in school? This version of events is more substantiated by hard facts and logic - validated by new astronomical research and statistical analysis of ancient manuscripts - than all that you have read and heard about history before.

The so-called universal classic world history is a finely woven magic fabric of intricate lies about events prior to the XVI century. It's likely that nobody told you before, but there is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artifact that could be reliably and independently dated earlier than the XI century.

Naturally, you will not readily believe that the classical history of ancient Rome, Greece, Asia, Egypt, China, Japan, India, etc., is manifestly false. You will knowingly point to the pyramids in Egypt, to the Coliseum in Rome, etc., and claim, aren't they really very ancient?

The consensual chronology we live with was essentially crafted in the XVI century from the contradictory mix of innumerable copies of ancient Latin and Greek manuscripts (originals have vanished in the Dark Ages) and the allegedly irrefutable proofs delivered by the late mediaeval astronomers, all cemented by the authority of the Church Fathers. It is manifestly wrong!

Newly-found artefacts such as vessels are compared to similar findings dated in accordance with the consensual chronology. The alteration of the chronological scale automatically alters the chronology of the new archaeological findings. An erroneous chronology completely invalidates all such methods. It is little wonder that the archaeologists investing their trust in such methods are constantly confronted with bizarre facts. It appears that "in certain remote parts of Europe one encounters the coexistence of things whose prototypes in the East are separated from each other by centuries" ([390], pages 55-56).

Furthermore, L. S. Klein ([390]) firmly denies all connexions between King Bjorn's Barrow and the mediaeval Bjorn, king of the Vikings. This method tells us only that Bjorn's Barrow is contemporary to the 18th-19th Egyptian dynasties; it tells us nothing about the possible datings of these actual reigns, which may well be mediaeval, along with Bjorn the Viking.

"The first schemes of Egyptian chronology had been based on the work of Manethon… who had compiled the list of the Pharaohs [allegedly in the III century BC - A. F.] and grouped them into 30 dynasties, having added up all the years of reigns [and assuming that their reigns have all been consecutive - A. F.]. The figures he got proved formidable.

Click here
Learn how and why Ancient Rome, Greece and Egypt
were crafted during Renaissance